CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Cladding Process for a Large Carbonization Tower

Literature Overview

This 2007 publication by Lin Zhusheng of Shandong Qilu Petrochemical Construction Company addresses the weld overlay cladding of a large carbonization tower used in coal gasification or coking processes. Carbonization towers operate under severe corrosive and erosive conditions involving high-temperature gas streams containing hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter. The interior surface must be protected by a corrosion- and erosion-resistant overlay, typically a nickel-based alloy or austenitic stainless steel.

The scale of the carbonization tower presents unique challenges: large diameter (often 3–8 meters), significant height (20–50 meters), and the need for continuous internal coverage. The cladding must be performed either during fabrication (on horizontal sections before erection) or in-situ (on erected vertical sections), each approach carrying distinct technical implications.

Core Technical Points

Material Selection

The overlay material selection depends on the specific corrosive environment within the carbonization tower:

Operating Condition Recommended Overlay Material Typical Alloy
High H₂S + CO environment Nickel-based alloy Inconel 625 or Alloy 625
Moderate corrosion, high erosion Austenitic stainless steel 310S or 309
High-temperature carburization Nickel-chromium alloy Hastelloy C-276
General internal corrosion Austenitic stainless steel 304L or 316L

The base material for a carbonization tower is typically carbon steel (Q345R or 16MnR per GB/T 150), chosen for structural economy, with the overlay providing the corrosion barrier.

Process Parameters

For large-diameter tower sections, submerged arc welding (SAW) is the most economical and efficient process for applying thick overlay layers:

Process Parameter Specification
Process SAW (single or dual wire)
Wire diameter 2.0–3.2 mm
Flux type Rutile or basic flux, low-hydrogen
Current 400–600 A (DC)
Voltage 28–35 V
Travel speed 150–250 mm/min
Layer thickness per pass 3–5 mm
Total overlay thickness 6–12 mm
Preheat temperature 100–150 °C
Interpass temperature ≤ 200 °C

Vertical Cladding Challenges

When cladding is performed on erected vertical tower sections, gravity effects on the molten pool become critical. The weld pool tends to sag, producing irregular bead profiles and potentially incomplete fusion at the bottom of the bead. Countermeasures include:

Standards and Quality Control

The cladding operation must comply with applicable pressure vessel codes. For a carbonization tower classified as a pressure vessel, GB/T 150 and NB/T 47002 govern the fabrication requirements. The overlay weld procedure must be qualified per NB/T 47014, and the welder must hold a valid qualification for the specific process and material combination.

Inspection Method Application Acceptance Criteria
Dye penetrant (PT) Surface of overlay No linear indications ≥ 0.5 mm
Magnetic particle (MT) Surface of overlay (ferromagnetic base) No cracks or linear indications
Ultrasonic (UT) Bond line between overlay and base No separation > 25% of area
Hardness test Overlay surface Within specified range (e.g., 180–250 HV for Inconel 625)
Chemical analysis Overlay composition Within ASTM specification limits
Macrograph Cross-section Full penetration, no lack of fusion

Engineering Practice Considerations

In the context of a large carbonization tower, the cladding schedule must be integrated with the overall project timeline. Typical sequence involves:

  1. Fabrication of tower sections (shell, heads, nozzles) from carbon steel plate.
  2. Assembly and fitting of internal sections on horizontal fixtures.
  3. SAW cladding of internal surfaces while in horizontal position (preferred for quality).
  4. Erection of cladded sections into vertical position.
  5. In-situ cladding of remaining areas (top head, vertical transitions) using vertical SAW or GTAW.
  6. Non-destructive examination of all overlay welds.
  7. Hydrostatic pressure testing after complete assembly.

The critical quality concern is the bond line between the carbon steel base and the nickel-based or stainless overlay. Incomplete fusion at this interface creates a corrosion pathway that can lead to catastrophic failure through intergranular corrosion or blistering. The macrograph examination is therefore mandatory for a representative sample of the cladding, typically 5–10% of total overlay area.

Study Insights

This document highlights the practical engineering approach to large-scale cladding in petrochemical construction. The emphasis on SAW as the primary process reflects the economic reality of applying thick overlay layers over large areas. The challenges of vertical-position welding and bond-line integrity are perennial concerns that require rigorous procedure qualification and workmanship control. The document underscores that material selection alone is insufficient; process parameters, joint design, and inspection protocols must all be aligned to achieve a reliable corrosion barrier.