Practice of High-Strength Wear-Resistant Alloy Weld Overlay on Sintering Machine Tail Scraper
Literature Overview
This 2011 publication in the journal "Sintering and Pelletizing" (烧结球团) by Han Shicheng, Chen Jun, and Dai Ruchang from the Sintering and Pelletizing Plant of Jinan Iron and Steel Group documents the practical application of high-strength wear-resistant alloy weld overlay on the tail scraper of a sintering machine. In the iron and steel industry, sintering machines are large continuous conveyor systems that transport iron ore and flux mixtures through the sintering process. The tail scraper is a critical component that removes the cooled sinter cake from the bed at the end of the machine, and it is subjected to severe abrasive and adhesive wear from the hot, abrasive sinter material. This case study provides valuable insights into the selection and application of wear-resistant overlay alloys in heavy industrial environments.
Technical Background and Wear Analysis
The sintering machine tail scraper operates under extreme wear conditions characterized by:
| Operating Condition | Parameter | Impact on Wear |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 200–400 °C | Thermal softening of base material |
| Abrasive particles | SiO₂, Al₂O₃, Fe₂O₃ (hardness 700–1000 HV) | Abrasive wear |
| Contact pressure | 5–15 MPa | Adhesive wear and plastic deformation |
| Sliding speed | 0.5–1.5 m/min | Moderate sliding velocity |
| Moisture | Variable | Corrosive wear in humid conditions |
| Service life (original) | 3–6 months | Frequent replacement required |
The original scraper was fabricated from Q345 low-alloy steel, which has a hardness of approximately 150–200 HB. This hardness is far below the threshold required to resist the abrasive wear from the sinter cake, which contains hard mineral particles with hardness values exceeding 700 HV. The rapid wear of the original scraper resulted in frequent maintenance shutdowns, with each replacement requiring 2–3 days of downtime and significant labor costs.
Overlay Alloy Selection and Comparison
The study evaluates several wear-resistant overlay alloys for their suitability in this application:
| Alloy Type | Composition (wt%) | Hardness (HRC) | Wear Resistance | Crack Resistance | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr-based (D110) | 25–30 Cr, 3–5 C | 58–64 | Excellent | Moderate | Medium |
| Cr-Mo-V (D127) | 12–15 Cr, 5–7 Mo, 3–5 C | 62–66 | Excellent | Good | Medium-high |
| Ni-Cr (D256) | 6–10 Ni, 4–6 Cr, 1–2 C | 56–62 | Good | Excellent | High |
| Fe-Cr-C (D117) | 25–30 Cr, 6–8 C | 62–68 | Excellent | Poor | Medium |
| Co-based (Stellite) | 50–60 Co, 15–25 Cr, 5–6 W | 45–55 | Excellent (hot) | Excellent | Very high |
Based on the evaluation, a Cr-Mo-V based hardfacing alloy (D127 type) was selected for this application. The selection criteria prioritized a balance between wear resistance, crack resistance, and cost-effectiveness. The D127 alloy provides excellent abrasive wear resistance due to its high hardness and the presence of hard carbides (Cr₇C₃, Mo₂C, VC), while its crack resistance is superior to that of the high-carbon Fe-Cr-C alloys due to the lower carbon content and the presence of nickel and molybdenum, which improve the toughness of the matrix.
Weld Overlay Process Parameters
The overlay welding was performed using flux-cored arc welding (FCAW) with the following process parameters:
| Parameter | Value | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Base material | Q345 steel, 20–30 mm thick | Original scraper plate |
| Overlay wire | D127 flux-cored wire, 1.6 mm diameter | Cr-Mo-V hardfacing |
| Welding current | 250–320 A | DCEN polarity |
| Voltage | 28–34 V | Stable arc for good deposition |
| Travel speed | 250–400 mm/min | For uniform bead geometry |
| Shielding gas | CO₂ (optional) | For FCAW with gas shielding |
| Preheat | 100–150 °C | To prevent cracking |
| Number of passes | 2–3 | For adequate overlay thickness |
| Bead width | 15–25 mm | Overlapping beads for full coverage |
| Overlay thickness | 3–5 mm | Adequate for wear protection |
| Post-weld treatment | None required | As-deposited hardness is acceptable |
The overlay was applied to the entire working surface of the scraper in a systematic pattern, with overlapping beads to ensure full coverage and uniform thickness. The welding sequence was designed to minimize distortion by welding from the center outward, alternating sides to balance the thermal input.
Performance Evaluation and Results
The performance of the overlay-repaired scraper was evaluated through both laboratory testing and field service monitoring:
| Evaluation Parameter | Original Scraper | Overlay-Repaired Scraper | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surface hardness | 180 HB (20 HRC) | 58–62 HRC | 3× increase |
| Service life | 3–6 months | 18–24 months | 3–4× extension |
| Maintenance frequency | Every 3–6 months | Every 18–24 months | 3–4× reduction |
| Annual downtime (days) | 12–24 days | 2–4 days | 80–90% reduction |
| Annual maintenance cost | High | Low | Significant savings |
The field results confirmed that the D127 overlay provided excellent wear resistance in the sintering machine application. The overlay layer maintained its hardness throughout the service life, with no significant degradation observed even after 18 months of continuous operation. The transition zone between the overlay and the base material was sound, with no cracking or spallation observed during the service period.
Defect Analysis and Process Optimization
During the implementation of the overlay process, several defects were encountered and addressed:
| Defect | Frequency | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cracking in overlay | Low (2–3%) | High cooling rate, hydrogen | Preheat to 100–150 °C, slow cooling |
| Poor bond strength | Very low (<1%) | Surface contamination | Thorough grinding and cleaning |
| Uneven thickness | Moderate (5–10%) | Operator inconsistency | Welding fixture, consistent parameters |
| Spatter | Moderate | Excessive current | Optimize current and voltage |
| Distortion | Low | Asymmetric heat input | Balanced welding sequence |
The study also emphasizes the importance of proper surface preparation before overlay welding. The base metal surface was ground to remove all rust, paint, and mill scale, exposing clean metal. Any surface defects such as cracks or inclusions were repaired before overlaying. This preparation step is critical because even a thin layer of contamination can significantly reduce the bond strength between the overlay and the base material.
Study Insights and Engineering Implications
This case study demonstrates the significant economic and operational benefits of applying wear-resistant weld overlay to critical components in the iron and steel industry. The key insight is that the selection of the overlay alloy must be based on a comprehensive understanding of the wear mechanism, operating conditions, and economic constraints, rather than simply choosing the hardest available alloy. The D127 Cr-Mo-V alloy provided an optimal balance of wear resistance, crack resistance, and cost for this specific application, whereas a harder but more brittle alloy might have cracked during service, and a softer but tougher alloy might have worn too quickly. For engineers in the sintering and pelletizing industry, this study provides a practical template for evaluating and implementing weld overlay solutions for wear-critical components. The methodology of alloy selection, process parameter optimization, defect prevention, and performance evaluation can be applied to other similar applications, such as scraper blades, conveyor wear plates, and crusher hammers in the mining and materials processing industries. The economic return on investment for the overlay repair was achieved within the first service cycle, making it a highly cost-effective maintenance strategy that should be considered for all wear-critical components in heavy industrial environments.
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD