CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Delamination Behavior of Stainless Steel Weld Overlay Layers on Pressure Vessels

Literature Overview

This paper, authored by Cheng Zhe-wen, Lu Hao, Wang Kai-yun, and Xu Meng-jia from the School of Materials Science and Engineering at Shanghai Jiao Tong University (published in 2016 in the journal "Hot Working Technology"), addresses a critical failure mode encountered in clad and weld-overlay pressure vessels: the delamination (spalling) of stainless steel overlay layers from the base metal. The study is significant because delamination represents one of the most insidious and costly defects in pressure vessel fabrication, as it often does not manifest until the vessel is in service or during hydrostatic testing. The authors employ metallurgical analysis, mechanical testing, and process parameter evaluation to identify the root causes and propose preventive measures.

Core Technical Findings

The research systematically examines the metallurgical interface between the stainless steel overlay (typically 304L or 316L) and the carbon steel or low-alloy steel base. The key findings revolve around three interrelated failure mechanisms:

  1. Interfacial bonding quality — The dilution ratio at the interface between the base metal and the overlay determines the chemical composition of the transition zone. Excessive dilution (>50%) can lead to the formation of brittle intermetallic phases such as sigma phase (FeCr) and martensite, which drastically reduce ductility and promote cracking.
  2. Residual stress accumulation — Each weld pass introduces thermal residual stresses. In multi-pass overlay welds, the superposition of these stresses can exceed the yield strength of the interface, creating conditions favorable for delamination initiation.
  3. Hydrogen-induced cracking (HIC) — Absorbed hydrogen during welding, particularly in thick-section overlays, can accumulate at the interface and cause delayed cracking. This is especially relevant for vessels operating under hydrogen service conditions.

Key Parameters and Process Windows

Parameter Recommended Range Risk Threshold
Dilution ratio at interface < 30% (first pass) > 50% (high brittleness risk)
Interpass temperature 100–150°C for austenitic overlay > 250°C (grain growth, sigma phase)
Heat input per pass 0.8–1.5 kJ/mm for GTAW > 2.0 kJ/mm (excessive dilution)
Preheat temperature (base metal) 50–100°C < 30°C (cold cracking risk)
Post-weld stress relief 550–650°C for 2 h per 25 mm thickness Incomplete PWHT (residual stress)

Metallurgical Analysis and Interface Characterization

The authors emphasize the importance of metallographic examination of the weld interface. A well-bonded overlay interface should exhibit a smooth, continuous transition with no visible cracks, pores, or unmelted base metal. The transition zone typically shows a gradient from ferritic base metal through a mixed microstructure (ferrite + martensite) to the fully austenitic overlay.

The critical observation is that delamination frequently initiates at the first weld pass interface, where the dilution is highest and the metallurgical incompatibility is greatest. The authors recommend using a transition weld metal (such as E309L or E309MoL) for the first pass to reduce dilution effects, followed by the final overlay layer of E308L or E316L.

Defect Analysis Using FMEA Approach

Failure Mode Severity Occurrence Detection RPN Countermeasure
Interfacial cracking 10 4 5 200 Use transition alloy, control dilution
Sigma phase formation 8 3 4 96 Limit interpass temperature, reduce heat input
Hydrogen-induced delamination 9 3 3 81 Post-weld bake-out, low-hydrogen consumables
Incomplete fusion 8 3 5 120 Proper joint preparation, technique training

Engineering Practice Implications

In engineering practice, delamination of overlay layers is often discovered during hydrostatic testing or during non-destructive examination (NDT) of the completed vessel. The consequences are severe: the vessel must be cut open, the affected area ground back to sound metal, and the overlay re-applied. This results in significant schedule delays and cost overruns.

Based on the findings of this paper, the following engineering practices should be adopted:

Study Insights and Reflections

This paper serves as an important reminder that the integrity of a weld overlay is determined not only by the final surface quality but by the cumulative metallurgical history of every pass. The delamination phenomenon is fundamentally a multi-scale problem: it involves macro-scale residual stresses, meso-scale microstructural evolution, and micro-scale hydrogen diffusion. Addressing it requires a holistic approach that integrates welding process control, materials selection, and post-weld treatment.

The paper's emphasis on the dilution ratio as the primary control parameter is particularly valuable for practicing engineers. In many fabrication shops, the focus tends to be on surface appearance and thickness compliance, while the subsurface metallurgy receives less attention. This study demonstrates that a systematic approach to interface control — including the use of transition alloys, controlled heat input, and proper post-weld treatment — can virtually eliminate delamination failures.