Heat Treatment Effects on GCr15 Cold-Rolling Mill Roll Cladding Microstructure and Wear Resistance Study Note
Literature Overview and Background
This study investigates the influence of post-weld heat treatment on the microstructure and wear resistance of GCr15 (Chinese standard bearing steel, equivalent to AISI 52100) cold-rolling mill roll cladding layers. Cold-rolling mill rolls are subjected to extreme contact stresses (up to 4 GPa), sliding friction, and thermal cycling during operation. The GCr15 cladding layer, typically deposited by high-speed burring (HVOF) or plasma spraying, must exhibit high hardness, fatigue resistance, and dimensional stability.
Core Technical Points
Microstructural Response to Heat Treatment
GCr15 is a high-carbon chromium bearing steel (0.95-1.05% C, 1.40-1.65% Cr) that can achieve hardness of 62-66 HRC after proper heat treatment. The as-deposited cladding layer typically exhibits a martensitic structure with retained austenite (10-25%), depending on the deposition process. The study examines how different tempering temperatures and holding times affect the microstructure and wear performance.
| Heat Treatment Condition | Hardness (HRC) | Retained Austenite (%) | Microstructure |
|---|---|---|---|
| As-deposited (HVOF) | 58-62 | 15-20 | Fine martensite + retained austenite |
| Tempering at 150 °C / 2h | 60-64 | 12-15 | Tempered martensite + fine carbides |
| Tempering at 200 °C / 2h | 58-62 | 10-12 | Tempered martensite + Cr7C3 |
| Tempering at 250 °C / 2h | 55-58 | 8-10 | Tempered martensite + spheroidized carbides |
| Double tempering (180 °C × 2h × 2) | 62-65 | 5-8 | Stable tempered martensite + fine dispersed carbides |
The study demonstrates that double tempering at 180 °C for 2 hours (two cycles) achieves the optimal balance of hardness (62-65 HRC), low retained austenite (5-8%), and high dimensional stability.
Wear Resistance and Rolling Contact Fatigue
The study employs ball-on-disk rolling contact fatigue tests and dry sliding wear tests to evaluate performance. The double-tempered condition exhibits 30-40% lower specific wear rate compared to the as-deposited condition, attributed to the elimination of unstable retained austenite and the formation of fine, uniformly dispersed carbides.
| Test Condition | Specific Wear Rate (mm³/N·m) | Fatigue Life (cycles to spalling) | Dominant Wear Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| As-deposited | 1.8×10⁻⁴ | 2.5×10⁵ | Micro-cracking + spalling |
| Single temper 180 °C | 1.2×10⁻⁴ | 4.0×10⁵ | Abrasive + adhesive |
| Double temper 180 °C | 0.9×10⁻⁴ | 6.5×10⁵ | Mild abrasive |
| Over-tempered 250 °C | 1.5×10⁻⁴ | 3.0×10⁵ | Adhesive + micro-ploughing |
Residual Stress Analysis
The as-deposited HVOF cladding layer exhibits high compressive residual stresses (-600 to -800 MPa), which are beneficial for fatigue resistance. However, tempering at temperatures above 200 °C leads to stress relaxation, reducing the compressive stress magnitude. The study recommends maintaining tempering below 200 °C to preserve beneficial compressive stresses while stabilizing the microstructure.
Process and Standards Compliance
For cold-rolling mill roll cladding, the relevant standards include GB/T 12466 (steel for cold-rolling mill rolls), ISO 3977 (bearing steel), and ASTM A285 (bearing steel). The cladding process must be qualified per NB/T 47014, with mechanical property testing including hardness, tensile strength, and impact toughness at the operating temperature.
| Requirement | Standard | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Hardness | ASTM E18 | 62-66 HRC (surface) |
| Retained austenite | ASTM E1000 | < 10% (by XRD) |
| Compressive residual stress | ASTM E975 | > 400 MPa (surface) |
| Bond strength | ASTM A264 | > 95% of base metal tensile |
| Surface roughness | ISO 4287 | Ra ≤ 0.8 μm (after grinding) |
Defect Analysis and Countermeasures
| Defect | Cause | Countermeasure |
|---|---|---|
| Surface cracks | Excessive retained austenite transformation | Double tempering to stabilize austenite |
| Hardness variation | Inconsistent deposition parameters | Process monitoring and statistical control |
| Delamination | Poor bond strength | Increase preheat, optimize deposition velocity |
| Excessive retained austenite | Insufficient tempering | Extend tempering time, lower tempering temperature |
Integration with Engineering Practice
In cold-rolling mills, roll surface condition directly affects product quality (surface finish, dimensional accuracy). The study recommends a post-deposition treatment sequence of: tempering at 180 °C for 2 hours, followed by cryogenic treatment at -80 °C for 4 hours, then final tempering at 180 °C for 2 hours. This sequence converts remaining metastable austenite to martensite, achieving hardness above 65 HRC with minimal retained austenite.
For quality control, each roll batch should undergo hardness mapping (minimum 20 points), retained austenite measurement by XRD, and ultrasonic bond strength testing. The study emphasizes that dimensional stability after heat treatment is critical, with maximum allowable distortion of 0.02 mm/m for precision cold-rolling applications.
Study Insights and Implications
The study provides clear evidence that post-weld heat treatment is not merely a residual stress relief step but a critical process variable that determines the long-term performance of GCr15 cladding. The double-tempering approach at 180 °C represents the optimal balance between hardness, toughness, and dimensional stability. For engineering practice, I strongly recommend implementing a cryogenic treatment step between the two tempering cycles to further reduce retained austenite and enhance wear resistance. This three-step treatment protocol (temper-cryo-temper) should be incorporated into the PQR and validated through rolling contact fatigue testing per ISO 281.
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD