CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Analysis of Cracking in Weld Overlay Layer of Rubber Extruder Screw Ridge

Literature Overview

This study note presents a failure analysis of cracking in the weld overlay layer applied to the screw ridge of a rubber extruder. Rubber extruders operate under conditions of high temperature (150-300 °C), high shear stress, and abrasive contact with rubber compounds containing fillers such as carbon black and silica. The screw ridge, which is the primary wear surface, is often repaired by weld overlay to restore dimensions and improve wear resistance. However, cracking in the overlay layer can lead to catastrophic failure, contaminating the rubber product and causing unplanned downtime. This case provides valuable insights into the metallurgical and mechanical factors that contribute to overlay layer cracking.

Failure Investigation and Root Cause Analysis

The investigation employed a systematic approach combining macroscopic examination, metallographic analysis, and fracture surface analysis. The overlay layer was applied using a hardfacing alloy, typically a cobalt-based or chromium-carbide-based material, with a target hardness of 50-65 HRC. The substrate was a medium-carbon alloy steel, such as 40Cr or 42CrMo, with a base hardness of 25-32 HRC.

The failure mode was identified as transverse cracking perpendicular to the screw axis, with cracks extending through the full thickness of the overlay layer and sometimes propagating into the substrate. The metallographic examination revealed the following features:

Microstructural Feature Location Interpretation
Martensitic transformation Overlay base and heat-affected zone High carbon dilution from substrate
Carbide networks Bond interface Excessive interfacial carbon concentration
Grain boundary cracking Overlay surface Thermal fatigue from repeated heating cycles
Microvoids Near bond interface Incomplete wetting of substrate surface

The root cause analysis identified three contributing factors:

  1. Excessive carbon dilution: The high-carbon hardfacing alloy combined with carbon from the substrate created a carbon-rich zone at the bond interface. This zone underwent martensitic transformation during cooling, generating high residual stresses and reduced ductility.
  2. Thermal fatigue: The repeated thermal cycling during extruder operation (150-300 °C) caused cyclic thermal strains in the overlay layer. The high hardness and low thermal conductivity of the hardfacing material amplified these thermal strains, leading to progressive crack initiation and propagation.
  3. Inadequate stress relief: The absence of post-weld stress relief treatment left high residual tensile stresses in the overlay layer, which acted as driving forces for crack propagation.

Remedial Measures and Process Optimization

Based on the failure analysis, several corrective measures were implemented:

Material Selection Modification

The overlay material was changed from a single hardfacing alloy to a multi-layer system:

Layer Material Function
Transition layer Ni-Fe alloy (low carbon) Buffer against carbon dilution
Intermediate layer Cr-C alloy (medium hardness, 45-50 HRC) Balance hardness and toughness
Surface layer Co-Cr-C alloy (high hardness, 55-60 HRC) Wear resistance

Process Parameter Optimization

The welding parameters were adjusted to minimize heat input and reduce dilution:

Post-Weld Treatment

A mandatory post-weld stress relief treatment was implemented at 600-650 °C for 2 hours, followed by controlled cooling in the furnace. This treatment reduced residual stresses by approximately 60-70%, significantly improving the fatigue resistance of the overlay layer.

Prevention Strategy and Monitoring Program

To prevent recurrence, a comprehensive prevention strategy was developed using the PDCA cycle:

The monitoring program includes ultrasonic thickness measurement of the overlay layer at intervals of 500 operating hours and dye penetrant testing at each scheduled maintenance interval. Any detected cracking is immediately addressed by removal of the affected area and reapplication of the overlay following the optimized procedure.

Study Insights and Engineering Implications

This failure analysis case is a powerful demonstration of how material selection, process control, and post-weld treatment interact to determine the long-term performance of a weld overlay repair. The most critical insight is that high hardness alone does not guarantee service life; the overlay layer must possess adequate toughness to withstand thermal cycling and mechanical loading. The multi-layer approach with a nickel-based transition layer proved essential in preventing the carbon dilution problem that caused the original failure. From an engineering practice standpoint, this case reinforces the principle that every weld overlay repair should be designed as a system, not as a single operation. The selection of each layer material, the welding parameters for each pass, and the post-weld treatment must all be coordinated to achieve the desired performance. Furthermore, the case highlights the importance of post-repair monitoring, as overlay layers can degrade over time due to thermal fatigue, and early detection of degradation allows for preventive intervention before catastrophic failure occurs.