CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Overlay Repair Process for Four-Roll Crusher Roller Shells

Overview of the Study

Four-roll crushers are heavy-duty industrial machines used primarily in cement, mining, and aggregate processing industries. The roller shells experience severe abrasive wear, impact loading, and sometimes corrosive environments, making overlay repair a critical maintenance activity. This study examines the overlay welding process for restoring worn roller shells, addressing material selection, process parameters, defect prevention, and post-weld treatment. The technical challenge lies in achieving adequate wear resistance while maintaining the structural integrity of the base steel and ensuring reliable bonding between the overlay and substrate.

Material Selection and Design Considerations

The selection of overlay material for crusher roller shells depends on the nature of the abrasive material being processed. Common overlay materials include high-chromium cast irons (Cr20, Cr26), medium-carbon martensitic steels with carbide additions (such as D2 or A2 tool steels), and austenitic manganese steels for impact-dominated wear conditions. The choice must balance hardness, toughness, and weldability with the operational requirements of the crusher.

Overlay Material Hardness (HRC) Wear Mechanism Typical Application
Cr20 High-Chromium Iron 55–62 Abrasive (sliding) Limestone, gypsum crushing
Cr26 High-Chromium Iron 58–65 Abrasive (high severity) Granite, basalt crushing
D2 Tool Steel 58–62 Abrasive + impact Mixed material crushing
14% Mn Austenitic Steel 20–30 (as-welded) Impact + abrasion Impact-dominated conditions
Ni-Cr alloy (Stellite 6) 40–45 High-temperature oxidation + abrasion Hot material handling

The base steel of the roller shell is typically a medium-carbon low-alloy steel such as 40Cr, 42CrMo, or equivalent grades. The dilution ratio between the overlay and base material significantly affects the final hardness and microstructure. For high-chromium iron overlays, dilution above 15% can reduce the effective carbide content and degrade wear resistance.

Process Parameters and Welding Technique

The overlay repair of roller shells typically employs submerged arc welding (SAW) or flux-cored arc welding (FCAW) for high deposition rates, with gas metal arc welding (GMAW) used for finishing passes or when access is restricted. The key process considerations include:

A critical process step is the preparation of the worn surface. The existing worn surface must be machined or ground to remove all loose material, and a suitable groove profile (V-groove or U-groove) should be cut to ensure proper fusion and mechanical interlock between the overlay and base material. The groove angle is typically 60°–90° for V-grooves, with a root radius of 2–3 mm to prevent stress concentration.

Defect Analysis and Countermeasures

Defect Type Cause Detection Method Countermeasure
Cracking at fusion boundary High carbon equivalent of base steel; excessive cooling rate MT (magnetic particle testing) Increase preheat; use low-hydrogen consumables
Porosity Contamination of surface; improper flux coverage RT (radiographic testing) or UT Thorough surface cleaning; proper flux application
Insufficient fusion Low travel speed; excessive arc length UT or destructive testing Optimize arc length; increase current
Hardness below specification Excessive dilution Hardness testing (Vickers) Reduce travel speed; use higher carbon overlay wire
Rolling/shelling of overlay Thermal stress; improper cooling Visual inspection; UT Controlled cooling; post-weld stress relief

Post-Weld Treatment and Quality Assurance

After overlay deposition, the roller shell requires appropriate post-weld treatment. For martensitic overlay materials, a tempering treatment at 550–620°C for 2–4 hours reduces residual stress and improves toughness without significantly reducing hardness. For austenitic manganese steel overlays, a controlled cooling rate (air cooling or slow furnace cooling) is essential to maintain the desired austenite-ferrite balance.

Quality assurance procedures include:

  1. Visual inspection of all weld surfaces for cracks, undercut, and excessive reinforcement
  2. Magnetic particle testing (MT) of the overlay surface and fusion boundary
  3. Ultrasonic testing (UT) of the fusion interface to detect lack of fusion
  4. Hardness profiling across the overlay thickness (minimum 3 measurements per pass)
  5. Dimensional verification of the restored roller geometry (out-of-roundness, taper)

Engineering Practice Case

In a cement plant application, a four-roll crusher with 800 mm diameter rollers experienced severe wear after 8,000 operating hours. The rollers were removed, and the worn surfaces (approximately 15–20 mm depth) were prepared by machining. A three-pass overlay using Cr26 high-chromium iron wire was deposited by SAW with a preheat temperature of 200°C. The first pass was a transition layer using a low-dilution consumable to reduce cracking susceptibility. The final overlay hardness measured 60–63 HRC, with a dilution ratio of approximately 10% at the fusion boundary. After tempering at 580°C, the hardness stabilized at 58–62 HRC. The repaired rollers returned to service and achieved an additional 12,000 operating hours before the next repair cycle, representing a significant improvement over the original 8,000-hour service life.

Key Reflections and Study Insights

The overlay repair of crusher roller shells is a classic example of how welding technology can extend the service life of heavy-duty equipment while reducing replacement costs. The key engineering insight is that the process design must be tailored to the specific wear mechanism — abrasive wear requires hard carbide-rich overlays, while impact wear requires tough austenitic materials. The dilution ratio is the single most critical factor affecting overlay performance, and its control requires careful selection of consumables, process parameters, and preheat conditions. Engineers should always verify the actual dilution ratio through metallographic examination rather than relying solely on theoretical estimates.