CLADTECH-LOGOCLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING TECHNOLOGY SHANXI CO., LTD
CLADDING · BIMETAL PRODUCT · BIMETAL PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNICAL STUDY

Cladding Process Qualification PQR and WPQR Technical Framework

Overview and Regulatory Context

Process qualification is the cornerstone of any cladding operation, providing the technical evidence that a specific welding procedure is capable of producing welds that meet the required mechanical, metallurgical, and corrosion resistance criteria. For cladding operations, the process qualification record (PQR) and the welding procedure qualification record (WPQR) serve as the documented proof that the procedure variables — including dilution rate, interpass temperature, preheat, and heat input — have been validated through testing and are capable of producing a conforming overlay layer. This study note examines the technical framework, testing requirements, and variable control strategies for cladding process qualification under the major international standards.

Standards Framework and Scope

Cladding process qualification is governed by several international and national standards, each with its own scope, variable definitions, and acceptance criteria. The following table summarises the key standards and their applicability:

Standard Scope Key Feature Applicable Materials
ASME IX, QW-451 Weld overlay qualification Defines essential and non-essential variables for cladding Carbon steel, low-alloy, stainless, nickel alloys
ISO 15614-7 Welding procedure qualification for overlay Similar to ASME IX but with European-specific variable definitions Wide range of metals
NB/T 47014 Chinese national standard for welding procedure qualification Incorporates Chinese regulatory requirements; references ASME and ISO Carbon steel, stainless, nickel alloys
EN 14726 Welding procedure qualification for overlay European standard; includes specific dilution rate requirements Stainless, nickel, titanium overlays

The fundamental principle across all these standards is that the PQR/WPQR must demonstrate that the welding procedure is capable of producing a conforming overlay layer under the specified range of process variables. The qualification is not a one-time event but a living document that must be re-evaluated whenever a material change, process change, or variable change occurs that falls outside the qualified range.

Essential Variables and Control Strategies

The identification and control of essential variables is the core of process qualification. For cladding operations, the essential variables differ from those for fusion welding because the overlay layer's performance is primarily governed by its chemical composition, microstructure, and bond integrity with the substrate. The following table presents the key essential variables for cladding process qualification and their control strategies:

Variable Typical Range Control Strategy Impact on Overlay
Preheat temperature 50–200°C (depends on base metal) Specified in WPS; verified by thermocouple Reduces cracking risk; affects dilution
Interpass temperature ≤ 200°C (typically) Monitored between passes; recorded Controls dilution; affects microstructure
Heat input 0.5–25 kJ/mm (process-dependent) Calculated from current, voltage, speed Affects dilution; grain size; residual stress
Dilution rate 5–30% (target-dependent) Measured by chemical analysis of overlay Determines overlay composition and corrosion resistance
Wire/feedstock type Specified grade Verified by mill certificate Directly determines overlay composition
Shielding gas composition Specified mixture Verified by gas analyser Affects arc stability; oxide content; dilution
Number of passes Specified in WPS Counted and recorded Affects dilution; bond strength; residual stress

The dilution rate is perhaps the most critical variable in cladding process qualification. It represents the percentage of base metal that is melted and incorporated into the overlay layer, and it directly determines the chemical composition of the overlay. For example, when Inconel 625 is clad onto a carbon steel substrate, a dilution rate of 10% will produce an overlay with a nickel content of approximately 55%, while a dilution rate of 30% will reduce the nickel content to approximately 45%, potentially compromising the corrosion resistance of the overlay. The dilution rate must be measured through chemical analysis of the overlay layer — typically by sampling from the centre of the overlay cross-section — and must fall within the acceptance criteria specified in the applicable standard or specification.

Testing Requirements and Acceptance Criteria

The PQR/WPQR for cladding must include a comprehensive suite of tests to verify the metallurgical and mechanical quality of the overlay layer. The following table summarises the typical test requirements and acceptance criteria:

Test Method Acceptance Criteria Purpose
Chemical analysis Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) Within specified range per material spec Verify overlay composition; measure dilution
Dilution rate measurement Chemical analysis of overlay centre Within specified range (e.g., 10–25%) Ensure overlay meets corrosion resistance requirements
Bond strength test Tensile test of bond zone ≥ 90% of base metal UTS (or specified minimum) Verify metallurgical bond integrity
Microstructural examination Metallographic examination No cracks, no unmelted particles, sound microstructure Verify metallurgical soundness
Hardness test Vickers hardness Within specified range; gradient across overlay acceptable Verify mechanical properties
Intergranular corrosion test ASTM A263 / A264 (for stainless overlay) No intergranular attack Verify corrosion resistance of overlay
HIC/SSC test NACE TM0177 / TM0284 (for sour service) No cracks; no blistering Verify resistance to hydrogen-induced cracking

The acceptance criteria for these tests are not universal — they vary depending on the application, the material, and the governing specification. For example, in sour service applications (high H₂S partial pressure), the overlay layer must pass the NACE TM0177 HIC/SSC test, which requires the overlay to have a hardness of less than 22 HRC and a specific microstructure (ferrite content < 10% for stainless overlays). Failure to meet these criteria can result in catastrophic failure of the pressure vessel in service.

Requalification Triggers and Change Control

One of the most critical aspects of process qualification is the identification of requalification triggers — changes in materials, process variables, or equipment that require a new PQR/WPQR. The following table summarises the common requalification triggers:

Change Category Example Requalification Required? Notes
Base metal change Different P-No. or specification Yes Different dilution behaviour
Overlay material change Different alloy grade or specification Yes Different composition and properties
Welding process change MAG to TIG; different process Yes Different heat input and dilution
Essential variable change Preheat outside qualified range Yes Must re-qualify within new range
Non-essential variable change Travel speed within qualified range No No requalification needed
Equipment change Different power source model Case-by-case Depends on output capability

The management of requalification triggers is a critical aspect of quality control in cladding operations. A common failure mode is the use of a qualified procedure outside its intended range — for example, applying a PQR qualified for 304 stainless overlay on carbon steel to a 316 stainless overlay on low-alloy steel without requalification. This practice is a violation of the applicable standard and can result in non-conforming overlay layers that fail to meet the required corrosion resistance or mechanical properties.

Engineering Practice and Case Study

A practical case illustrating the importance of rigorous process qualification involves the cladding of a hydrogenation reactor tube sheet with Inconel 625 overlay. The initial PQR was qualified with a dilution rate of 18%, an interpass temperature of 150°C, and a preheat of 100°C. During production, the welding team observed that the dilution rate was consistently exceeding 25%, leading to overlay layers that failed the intergranular corrosion test. Investigation revealed that the travel speed had been reduced to improve deposition rate, which increased the heat input and consequently the dilution rate. The corrective action was to re-qualify the procedure with a lower heat input range, to implement a mechanised cladding system with precise travel speed control, and to add dilution rate monitoring as a production hold point. This case demonstrates that process qualification is not a static document but a dynamic control system that must be actively managed throughout the production lifecycle.

Study Insights and Conclusions

The cladding process qualification framework, as defined by standards such as ASME IX QW-451, ISO 15614-7, and NB/T 47014, provides a rigorous and systematic approach to validating welding procedures for overlay applications. The key technical insights are: (1) the dilution rate is the most critical variable in cladding qualification and must be measured and controlled through chemical analysis; (2) the essential variables for cladding differ from those for fusion welding and must be specifically identified and controlled; (3) requalification is required whenever a material or essential variable change occurs, and this must be enforced through a formal change control process; and (4) the testing suite for cladding qualification must include not only mechanical and metallurgical tests but also corrosion resistance tests specific to the service environment. Engineers should approach process qualification not as a compliance exercise but as a technical investigation into the behaviour of the welding process and the overlay layer, with the goal of understanding and controlling the variables that determine overlay performance.